Search

Blog Entries:

Some posts from The Methodology Blog around the time of Fired For Customer Service

Archives by Subject:

More Resources

Fired For Customer Service

Friday, November 13, 2009 by Slaughter Development

Customer service, or lack thereof, is an enormous part of thriving in business today. Yet, as one airline employee discovered, people must be cautious with how they respond to frustrated consumers. Otherwise, they may get fired.

An article posted on switched.com reported on an American Airlines web designer, anonymously named ”Mr. X”, who was fired after responding to a dissatisfied customer’s complaint. According to the airline, his e-mail to the disgruntled individual “violated a Non-Disclosure Agreement (NDA) that he had signed with the airline and that prohibited him from revealing ‘sensitive information.’” Yet to Dustin Curtis, the frustrated customer, Mr. X’s response was the only positive outcome he received from the company:

AA fired Mr. X because he cared. They fired him because he cared enough to reach out to a dissatisfied customer and help clear the company’s name in the best way he could.

Though this story has several points of view and varying issues that can be argued, there is one common factor: disconnect. By reading Mr. Curtis’ original letter and Mr. X’s email response, you may gather there is an obvious disconnect not only between American Airlines and its customers, but between the airline and its employees as well. As the Methodology Blog has covered before, insufficient leadership and bad management styles can create unhappy employees. And where there are dissatisfied employees, there are dissatisfied customers.

As cliché as it sounds, if problems persist in a top-down fashion through a company, a sweeping domino effect can occur; leaving all stakeholders at a loss. For Mr. Curtis, his conclusions on how American Airlines operates are reason enough for him to steer clear of becoming a reoccuring customer:

The reason large companies with bad design are the way they are is because they are run poorly from the top, with philosophies that force the entire company to behave like its lowest common denominator. The company ends up making bad products. It ends up treating its customers badly. And if the company is being run by people who don’t have taste, it gets stuck. Eventually, the company’s brand suffers.

If your company is suffering from countercompetence which results in a loss of clientele, problems within management or a lack in successful and productive work, contact Slaughter Development today. We help organizations leverage innovation from the bottom up.

❖ ❖ ❖

Like this post? Here are some related entries from The Methodology Blog you might enjoy:

Customer Service and Phone Calls - Over at the website Reddit.com, a commenter retold the story of the “best use of a cell phone” he has seen all year. The call was placed while standing in line to the same desk:
Read on »
More Choices, More Waste - As much as 10% of all supermarket food is dumped because it spoils before it can be sold. This amounts to $20 billion in annual waste in America alone. The cause may be from too many choices for consumers. Read on »
Friendly but Bloated Skies - Of all of the Star Alliance partners, South Africa Airlines (SAA) may be at the bottom of the heap. A recent study indicates that SAA has five times as many employees per plane as some of their competitors. Read on »
Want to learn more? Register now for the 2011 Productivity Series

Leave a Reply

Switch to our mobile site