Search

Blog Entries:

Some posts from The Methodology Blog around the time of Caps Lock Termination

Archives by Subject:

More Resources

Caps Lock Termination

Thursday, September 3, 2009 by Slaughter Development

You might lose your job for any number of reasons, but being fired is usually connected to a major mistake. One New Zealand woman, however, was terminated because of her use of the caps lock key.

According to an article in The New Zealand Herald:

An Auckland accountant was sacked for sending “confrontational” emails with words in red, in bold and in capital letters.

Vicki Walker, who was a financial controller with ProCare Health, has been awarded $17,000 for unfair dismissal, and plans to lodge an appeal for further compensation.

Walker said they talked about a number of emails she had sent, yet used only one in evidence. The email, which advises her team how to fill out staff claim forms, specifies a time and date highlighted in bold red, and a sentence written in capitals and highlighted in bold blue. It reads: “To ensure your staff claim is processed and paid, please do follow the below checklist.”

It’s not possible to know the entire story from one news article, but the premise is still fascinating. Does the use of uppercase letters, bold text and bright colors have a significant influence in stakeholder satisfaction?

It would seem that ProCare Health feels the answer is yes. We at Slaughter Development would have to agree—not with the decision to sack Ms. Walker, of course, but with the notion that the way we produce messages influences the productivity and satisfaction of the recipient. According to the article, Ms. Walker “had contributed to disharmony in the workplace,” so the real question here is not why Ms. Walker chose to utilize such highlighted text, but instead, why its emphasis offended her colleagues and employer to such a serious extent? As The Methodology Blog has covered before, the ordeal Ms. Walker and ProCare Health are dealing with is an example of emotional contagion.

Usually, the true intentions behind written or spoken words are intended to be helpful and effective. However, actual meanings can be skewed through alternate interpretations. The way an individual perceives particular communication is often entirely different than what was meant originally—especially when it comes to email. The Methodology Blog has noted before that cryptic messages have a polarizing effect, often resulting in an uneasy and potentially counterproductive environment. Don’t allow miscommunication to negatively influence harmony between stakeholders. Contact us today to learn more about how we can help.

❖ ❖ ❖

Like this post? Here are some related entries from The Methodology Blog you might enjoy:

Did you READ the email? - We admit it. We love it when social media reveals workplace frustration. Here’s another one fired off via Twitter.
Read on »
Termination by “Mr. Nice Guy” - In the humor publication The Onion a spoof editorial relays an annoying workplace conversation where the question, “Hey you got a second?”, is followed by the worst possible news. Although satire, this piece offers a vivid picture of workplace communication gone bad. Read on »
Productive Text Messaging - The text message phenomenon has left the world of teenagers and moved into business. Yet for many professionals, texting is mostly frustrating and useless.
Read on »
Want to learn more? Register now for the 2011 Productivity Series

Leave a Reply

Switch to our mobile site