Search

Blog Entries:

Some posts from The Methodology Blog around the time of Incentives to Innovate

Archives by Subject:

More Resources

Incentives to Innovate

Saturday, February 20, 2010 by Slaughter Development

There’s a weird relationship between innovation and motivation. You can’t force creativity. Instead, you have to find ways to inspire creative people and get out of the way.

That’s the topic of an article from Slate, called How to Make America More Innovative. Writer Ray Fisman reviews a study of two different approaches for funding medical research:

The [Howard Hughes Medical Institute] and [National Institutes of Health] funding incentives are a study in contrasts. HHMI gives five years’ worth of research funding, renewable at least once as long as reviewers see effort, not necessarily results. NIH funding typically expires after a few years. HHMI picks “people not projects” while the NIH does the opposite, tethering funding to particular experiments or analyses.

Despite comparable pre-award performance, the two groups diverge in the years that follow. HHMI winners are almost twice as likely to produce studies that are highly cited by other researchers. They are also more likely to produce research that introduces new words and phrases into their fields of research, as measured by the list of “keywords” they attach to their studies to describe their work. The downside is that they also produce more stinkers—studies that never get cited by anyone. But, again, that’s part of the exploration process.

Put simply, there are broadly two approaches to getting innovation out of creative people. Either use the NIH model of measuring closely and keeping researchers on a short leash, or try the HHMI system of choosing smart people and sending them off to work with minimal supervision.

Not surprisingly, the latter technique is more effective. Giving people plenty of room simply produces more results. Admittedly, some of those ideas might be terrible. But with lots of options, you are more likely to have better success overall.

You can use the Howard Hughes Medical Institute model at your company by picking people, not projects. You can imbue them with responsibility and authority to be innovative. Encourage them to come up with lots of ideas, even if some might end up being worthless. Trust leads to empowerment, and empowerment to productivity and satisfaction. Show your employees that you believe in their power to innovate without excessive oversight.

To learn more about innovation, especially with regard to workflow and productivity, contact Slaughter Development. We believe the best ideas for improving your organization are the ones your employees will generate when motivated, empowered and heralded for their work.

❖ ❖ ❖

Like this post? Here are some related entries from The Methodology Blog you might enjoy:

The 99-Year Mistake - No matter how fool-proof something may seem or how long it has existed without discrepancy, correction or improvement is always a possibility—even if it means updating after 99 years. Read on »
Process Follows People - No industry should be more focused on the well-being of people than healthcare. According to a new study however, organizations are over-emphasizing process and technology to the detriment of workers. Read on »
Productivity and Mindfulness - Concerned that your inability to concentrate might affect your productivity at work? You might be interested in the results of a powerful new scientific study.
Read on »
Want to learn more? Register now for the 2011 Productivity Series

Leave a Reply

Switch to our mobile site