Search

Blog Entries:

Some posts from The Methodology Blog around the time of The Y2K+10 Bug

Archives by Subject:

More Resources

The Y2K+10 Bug

Sunday, January 3, 2010 by Slaughter Development

Billions of people worldwide recently celebrated the dawn of a new year by counting down the seconds until January 1, 2010. However, a retail shopping network in Australia decided to leap forward to January 2016.

The Sydney Morning Herald has an initial report on the computer glitch:

Retail businesses across the country have lost thousands of dollars over the long weekend because a computer glitch left shoppers unable to use the Bank of Queensland’s Eftpos terminals.

BOQ’s Eftpos machines skipped ahead six years when the clock ticked over to January 1 and started date stamping January 2016.

BOQ staff have not been able find what caused the problem, but a temporary solution has been put in place to ease retailers’ frustrations.

The glitch cost businesses untold amounts as the Eftpos terminals read customers’ cards as having expired and refused their transactions.

We may never know exactly what caused this problem, but certainly countless small retailers are angry about the loss of sales and having to turn away customers. But even without understanding the technical details, we can identify two process problems:

First, it seems the Bank of Queensland did not flag the 2010 rollover as a condition which required intentional testing. This doesn’t take a computer genius to identify. After all, moving from 12/31/2009 to 1/1/2010 clearly requires more attention than say, moving from 12/15/2009 to 12/16/2009. This is a new month, a new year, and a new decade. After the world spent billions of dollars to fix the Y2K problem, one would think a major world bank would have thought to test their systems by setting the date forward.

To understand the second process error, take a look at the comments of one frustrated business owner:

Barry Jones, owner of Sharky’s T-shirt and souvenir store in Cairns, said his business was without an Eftpos machine for two days.

He spent close to an hour on the BOQ’s helpline on Friday to no avail and did not receive as much as a courtesy call from the BOQ to explain the problem or tell him it had been fixed.

Apparently, the Bank of Queensland failed to communicate with stakeholders regarding process issues. It’s okay for companies to make mistakes, but talking to customers, explaining the problem, and letting them know when it is resolved reduces the impact of the problem and builds confidence. As is described in The Unexpected Patron, the most important part of any problem is usually not what caused it, but how you deal with it when it happens.

To learn more about how to design and execute effective business processes, attend out upcoming seminar How NOT To Make New Year’s Resolutions at Work this Wednesday, January 6 at 2:00PM. Register today!

❖ ❖ ❖

Like this post? Here are some related entries from The Methodology Blog you might enjoy:

Caught Goofing Off - Yesterday, a woman named Amanda Hite made a routine visit to the Bureau of Motor Vehicles. While waiting in line, she noticed an employee playing computer solitaire—and managed to snap a picture with her cellphone camera. Read on »
Did you READ the email? - We admit it. We love it when social media reveals workplace frustration. Here’s another one fired off via Twitter.
Read on »
More Than a Name - Every file on your computer has to have a name. Selecting the right text might seem like an easy task, but bad filenames are actually a major problem.
Read on »
Want to learn more? Register now for the 2011 Productivity Series

Leave a Reply

Switch to our mobile site